The move is in stark contrast to the legal battle it is fighting with OpenAI.
The New York Times has signed a landmark licensing deal with Amazon that will allow the tech giant to use its journalism across a range of artificial intelligence products. The agreement covers content from the Times, NYT Cooking and The Athletic, and is the paper’s first major partnership involving generative AI.
The deal comes as the Times is also pursuing a copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of using millions of its articles without permission to train large language models. Taken together, the two moves show how leading publishers are both commercialising and protecting their content as AI reshapes the media landscape.
Meredith Kopit Levien, chief executive of the NYT, said the agreement was in line with the company’s core belief that “high-quality journalism is worth paying for”. Although financial terms were not disclosed, reports suggest the deal is significant and will allow Amazon to use Times content to train its own AI models as well as surface it across customer experiences.
The legal case against OpenAI and Microsoft centres on the claim that tools like ChatGPT undermine the paper’s subscription model by recreating its content without attribution or payment. The Times says this threatens its financial sustainability and has budgeted more than $4 million for legal costs through early 2025.
OpenAI has argued its training practices fall under fair use and that its models learn patterns in text rather than replicating articles. The case has been consolidated with other lawsuits against the tech companies and will now proceed through the US District Court.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is current, with the latest developments reported on May 29, 2025. The earliest known publication date of similar content is December 27, 2023, when The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. ([cnn.com](https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/27/tech/new-york-times-sues-openai-microsoft/index.html/?utm_source=openai)) The report is not republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. There are no discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes compared to earlier versions. The article includes updated data and does not recycle older material. No similar content has appeared more than 7 days earlier. The update justifies a higher freshness score and should not be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The direct quote from Meredith Kopit Levien, Chief Executive of The Times, stating, “The deal is consistent with our long-held principle that high-quality journalism is worth paying for,” is unique to this report. No identical quotes appear in earlier material. The wording matches the original source, with no variations. No online matches are found for this quote, indicating potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from WinBuzzer, a reputable technology news outlet. The report is corroborated by other reputable organisations, including the Financial Times, Axios, and Reuters. ([ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/bc73404e-6f01-4b9e-9563-1a5f055d2c98?utm_source=openai), [axios.com](https://www.axios.com/2025/05/30/nyt-amazon-ai-licensing-deal?utm_source=openai), [reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/new-york-times-amazon-sign-ai-licensing-deal-2025-05-29/?utm_source=openai)) The New York Times is a well-established and verifiable entity. The report does not mention any unverifiable persons, organisations, or companies.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The time-sensitive claim of The New York Times entering into a licensing agreement with Amazon is verified by multiple reputable sources. ([ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/bc73404e-6f01-4b9e-9563-1a5f055d2c98?utm_source=openai), [axios.com](https://www.axios.com/2025/05/30/nyt-amazon-ai-licensing-deal?utm_source=openai), [reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/new-york-times-amazon-sign-ai-licensing-deal-2025-05-29/?utm_source=openai)) The report includes supporting details from other reputable outlets, confirming the accuracy of the information. The report includes specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, enhancing its credibility. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic, with no strange phrasing or incorrect spelling variants. The structure is focused and relevant, without excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is appropriately formal and resembles typical corporate or official language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is current, original, and corroborated by multiple reputable sources. The quotes are unique and the source is reliable. The claims are plausible and supported by specific details. No credibility risks were identified.
